On Hun Xen's refusal to answer SRP MPs' questions

The National Assembly is a democratic debating forum and the most supreme law-making body as well as a national watchdog, check and balance institution/mechanism in the land. Therefore, where matters pertaining to public interest and the integrity of the Constitution, treaties, legislations etc. or the infringement thereof, in their specific concrete context, it is incumbent upon law-makers to bring such matters to light and to demand their full, thorough accounts/explanations in a transparent manner.

SRP Senator Kong Korm and SRP MP Mu Sochua talked to the press following the meeting

Where questions are perceived or defined as accusations instead, the said accusations must be endorsed by relevant points of law or demonstrated clearly why the accusations made fall outside the remit of the National Assembly and belong in the Court of law.

There is a long catalogue of cases that have simply been fast-tracked from the alleged scenes of the crime directly to the judges who are ordered to hand justice and sentences down the defendants' throats without going through the above mentioned investigative stage and due diligence. For instance, in the case of Mr Sam Rainsy's charge of deliberate falsification of public documents, the charge needs to be backed up with tangible, circumstantial evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt his offense under relevant laws of the land - not laws of the PM or the recommendations of his foreign patrons.

This is why this letter is entirely in character with one ingrained with police state mentality who has yet to begin to accept that neither him nor his government or office is above the rule of law, to which he even has the audacity to make reference in complete contempt, arrogance, ridicule and mockery.